Second woman alleges Epstein sent her to UK to have sex with Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, according to new claims presented publicly by a United States-based lawyer representing multiple Epstein survivors worldwide.
The allegation adds to ongoing scrutiny surrounding the former royal’s past associations and alleged conduct.
The woman, whose identity has not been disclosed, claims she travelled to the United Kingdom in 2010 after arrangements were made by Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sex offender whose extensive network and activities continue to be investigated years after his death.
According to her legal representative, the woman was in her twenties at the time of the alleged encounter and was not a British citizen, a detail that has complicated independent verification of travel records and official documentation.
Her lawyer, Brad Edwards, stated in a broadcast interview that the woman claims she spent the night at Royal Lodge, the former residence of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, following an encounter allegedly facilitated by Epstein.
The claim marks the first time an Epstein accuser has publicly alleged that a sexual encounter linked to Epstein took place at a royal residence, elevating the seriousness and sensitivity of the accusations.
Edwards further stated that the woman alleges she was later given a guided tour of Buckingham Palace, including hospitality traditionally reserved for official or personally approved guests of the royal household.
While Buckingham Palace is known to keep detailed records of visitors and guided tours, journalists have reported that confirming the woman’s account would require disclosing her identity, which she has chosen to keep private.
BBC News reported that requests for comment were sent to representatives of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor but had not received a response at the time of publication, leaving the allegations formally unanswered.
The former prince has consistently denied any wrongdoing in connection with Jeffrey Epstein and has rejected previous accusations made by other women who alleged they were trafficked by Epstein for sexual purposes.
The new allegation emerges amid renewed public attention following the release of documents, emails, and testimonies connected to Epstein’s network, some of which have implicated prominent figures in politics, business, and royalty.
Edwards explained that his client claims there were communications between herself and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor prior to the alleged meeting, suggesting coordination beyond Epstein’s involvement alone.
He also stated that he has been in intermittent contact with legal representatives believed to be acting on behalf of the former prince in the United States, though he described those communications as inconsistent.
According to the lawyer, contact with legal counsel reportedly diminished following King Charles’s decision to formally remove his brother’s remaining titles, honours, and royal style in late 2025.
That decision followed the posthumous publication of a memoir by Virginia Giuffre, another Epstein accuser who had previously brought civil legal action against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in the United States.
Giuffre alleged she was trafficked by Epstein and forced into sexual encounters with the former prince on multiple occasions between 2001 and 2002, including in London, New York, and the Caribbean.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has repeatedly denied Giuffre’s claims, and the civil lawsuit filed in New York was settled in 2022 without an admission of liability, reportedly for a substantial financial sum.
Giuffre’s death in 2025 brought renewed attention to Epstein survivor cases and prompted calls from campaigners for greater transparency, accountability, and institutional reform across jurisdictions.
Edwards has said he currently represents more than 200 Epstein survivors globally, many of whom continue to pursue civil remedies or seek acknowledgment through public testimony rather than criminal prosecution.
In the case of the latest allegation, the lawyer stated he is considering filing a new civil lawsuit against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor on behalf of the woman, depending on jurisdictional and evidentiary factors.
Legal experts note that such cases face significant hurdles, including statutes of limitation, cross-border jurisdiction issues, and the challenge of corroborating historical allegations without contemporaneous documentation.
Nonetheless, the emergence of multiple accusers over an extended period has continued to shape public debate about accountability for those allegedly connected to Epstein’s activities.
Jeffrey Epstein died in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, an event officially ruled a suicide that has remained the subject of widespread speculation.
Despite his death, investigations into Epstein’s associates have continued, driven by document releases, civil lawsuits, and media reporting that have revealed the scale of his influence and connections.
Campaigners argue that institutional deference to wealth and power allowed Epstein to operate for decades, exploiting vulnerable individuals while maintaining access to elite social and political circles.
The British monarchy has sought to distance itself from Epstein-related controversies, particularly following Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s withdrawal from public royal duties in 2019.
Royal officials have consistently stated that the monarchy does not comment on private legal matters involving non-working members of the royal family.
Public reaction to the latest allegation has been divided, with some calling for renewed investigations, while others urge caution until claims are tested through formal legal processes.
Advocacy groups representing survivors of sexual exploitation have emphasized the importance of listening to accusers while ensuring fair and impartial judicial procedures are followed.
Read also:Mardi Gras Parade shooting in Louisiana sparks fear after gunfire wounds five in Clinton
Newsmen has reported that it has attempted to contact Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor directly for comment regarding the new allegation but has not received a response.
As legal teams assess potential next steps, the allegation adds to a growing body of claims that continue to reshape public understanding of Epstein’s network and its alleged reach into institutions once considered untouchable.
Whether the claim results in legal proceedings or remains part of the broader historical record, it underscores ongoing demands for transparency, accountability, and justice for survivors worldwide.
About The Author
