Fresh allegations have been levelled against the federal lawmaker representing Obokun/Oriade Federal Constituency, Oluwole Oke, over claims of abuse of office and conflicts of interest involving federally funded projects in Osun State
The claims were made by a lawyer and Accord Party chieftain, Pelumi Olajengbesi, who accused the legislator of using his official position to benefit companies linked to him through proxies.
According to the lawyer, these actions, if proven, constitute a violation of the Code of Conduct for Public Officers and the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act (ICPC Act).
At the centre of the controversy is the Ikeji-Arakeji project, which involves the construction of inner roads and installation of solar streetlights.
The project, with a 2024 Federal Budget allocation of ₦500 million, was intended to improve infrastructure in the community.
However, Olajengbesi claimed that little visible progress has been made on the ground, raising questions about whether the project has been executed as planned.
The dispute also involves MC Aremo Nigeria Limited, a company reportedly recommended for the contract in a letter allegedly written by Oluwole Oke to the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development.
Olajengbesi alleged that the company is indirectly controlled by the lawmaker through trusted associates, a move he described as a clear conflict of interest.
He further stated that using intermediaries to secure contracts for personal benefit is prohibited under Nigerian law, and could amount to both abuse of office and the conferment of corrupt advantage.
The lawyer also highlighted the ownership structure of MC Aremo Nigeria Limited, naming two individuals, Ogunsiji Jacob Damisi and Olutoke Victor Adewale, as the official proprietors.
According to Olajengbesi, both individuals are connected to Oluwole Oke—one as a long-time professional associate and the other as a staff member involved in previous ventures linked to the lawmaker.
These alleged ties, the lawyer suggested, raise concerns about transparency and proper governance in public procurement.
Olajengbesi further raised questions about other associated companies, including Mukusmukus and Olumojo Lines, urging Oluwole Oke to clarify his links to these entities.
He insisted that full disclosure is essential for accountability, especially where public funds are involved.
In addition to the legal and administrative arguments, the lawyer highlighted a political dimension.
He criticised the lawmaker for allegedly focusing on political commentary against Osun State Governor Ademola Adeleke, rather than ensuring the delivery of projects in his constituency.
Olajengbesi personally visited Ikeji-Arakeji and observed that much of the project appeared incomplete, despite budget allocations dating back to 2024.
To press his point, Olajengbesi issued a six-hour ultimatum to Oluwole Oke, demanding a public apology to the people of Oriade/Obokun.
He warned that failure to respond would lead to further scrutiny of the lawmaker’s connections with MC Aremo Nigeria Limited, Mukusmukus, Olumojo Lines, and potentially other companies.
As of the time of filing this report, Oluwole Oke has not issued an official response addressing the claims.
Observers note that the coming days may determine whether the matter escalates into a formal legal or investigative process.
The unfolding situation underscores the broader conversation around accountability, transparency, and ethical conduct in public service.
Whether the allegations amount to proven abuse of office remains to be determined, but the controversy has undeniably placed Oluwole Oke at the centre of intense public scrutiny.
About The Author
