A fresh controversy has emerged within the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP), as one of its factions rejected a recent judgment delivered by the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja.
The dispute, centered on internal leadership struggles, has once again brought the NNPP into the spotlight amid ongoing political tensions.
The NNPP faction, aligned with Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, faulted the ruling delivered by Justice Bello Kawu, arguing that the court exceeded its jurisdiction.
According to the group, the NNPP case was already being considered by a competent court, and any attempt to intervene at that stage undermines established legal procedures.
The party insists that the NNPP matter should follow the proper judicial hierarchy without interference.
The ruling in question directed the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to recognize a factional leadership led by Dr. Agbo Gilbert Major.
This directive has further complicated the NNPP leadership tussle, which has lingered for months and continues to divide members of the party across different political alignments.
In its reaction, the NNPP faction maintained that the case before the Abuja court was initiated by individuals who had been expelled from the party.
The group claimed these individuals, allegedly working in alignment with Boniface Aniebonam, are attempting to destabilize the NNPP ahead of the 2027 general elections.
The faction insists that such actions are politically motivated and aimed at weakening the party’s structure.
Another major concern raised by the NNPP faction is the issue of fair hearing.
It alleged that it was not properly served with court processes, adding that the method of substituted service used by the court was questionable.
The party argued that proper service is essential in ensuring justice and that any deviation could affect the credibility of the NNPP case.
The faction also pointed out that the NNPP dispute is already before the Court of Appeal in Owerri.
It argued that the Abuja High Court ought to have refrained from taking further action, citing the principle of sub judice.
According to the NNPP, proceeding with the case while another court is already handling the same matter creates legal confusion and undermines due process.
Describing the ruling as unfair and a threat to democratic values, the NNPP faction warned that such judicial decisions could have broader implications beyond party politics.
It stressed that if disputes within the NNPP are not handled properly, it could weaken public trust in institutions and raise concerns about fairness in the electoral system.
Despite its strong objections, the NNPP faction expressed confidence in the appellate courts.
It confirmed that steps have already been taken to challenge the Abuja ruling, insisting that it remains committed to pursuing justice through lawful means.
The party emphasized that it will continue to defend its position until a final determination is reached.
The ongoing NNPP leadership dispute highlights deeper structural and political disagreements within the party.
As the NNPP continues to navigate internal divisions, observers believe the outcome of the legal battles could shape its future direction and influence its preparedness for the 2027 elections.