Israel Solomon’s Pools seizure threat has intensified after far-right ministers declared they want to “erase” Palestinian ownership of the 2,000-year-old reservoirs near Bethlehem. The move marks a sharp escalation in Israel’s campaign for West Bank land and control of historical sites.
The pools date back to the second century BCE. Romans expanded them to supply Jerusalem 13km away, and Ottomans later added a third basin and fort. Today they are Bethlehem’s main green space and swimming spot.
Since May, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has led calls to take the site. He was filmed swimming in the middle pool with lawmaker Zvi Sukkot while police cleared Palestinians from the area. “This is our land,” Smotrich declared.
Why Solomon’s Pools Matter To Both Sides
The reservoirs hold 250,000 cubic metres of water. They are one of the largest surviving ancient water systems in the world, and for Palestinians they are also a rare place to swim and picnic.
On Fridays families travel from Bethlehem, just 3.5km away. Children jump from stone walls into deep green water while men fish from the ramparts. The site has become a sanctuary as settlements surround the city.
“It’s the only place now in all Bethlehem that you can find somewhere to sit and to enjoy the water, the shade, the green space – and now they are trying to steal it,” said Mahmoud Jaber, a local activist from Artas.
The Legal Status Under Oslo
Under the 1995 Oslo II Accord, Solomon’s Pools was placed in Area A. That means full Palestinian civil and security control. Area A was meant to be a step toward a Palestinian state.
Israel’s security cabinet broke that precedent in February by asserting control over Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem. A seizure of the pools would go further, showing Area A can be taken by ministerial decision.
Smotrich called Palestinian control a “terrible mistake” of Oslo. “We are working hard to repair the terrible damage caused by the Oslo Accords disaster,” he said during his May visit.
The pressure has already increased on the ground. Settlers from nearby Efrat have made frequent incursions. On 10 July, Israeli soldiers raided while children were swimming and fired teargas into the water.
Archaeologists warn the site is being politicized. Alon Arad of Emek Shaveh said, “This site is being weaponised in order to erode and basically cancel the Oslo agreement.” He noted there are 6,000 ancient sites in the West Bank with varied heritage.
The PA Waqf owns the pools and wanted to develop tourism. Those plans collapsed after Smotrich withheld Palestinian tax revenues, leaving the site with crumbling walls and litter.
Hardline commentators now argue the pools are “uniquely Jewish.” Reserve Lt Col Maurice Hirsch wrote that the name itself proves Jewish historical significance.
That claim is disputed. King Solomon, if he existed, lived about 800 years before construction began. The first two pools were built under Herod the Great, a Roman client king.
Local officials say the name likely refers to Ottoman Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, who restored Jerusalem’s walls in the 16th century. Palestinians have used the name for centuries.
Eman al-Titi, head of Bethlehem’s tourism and antiquities department, pushed back. “Archaeological sites should never become instruments of political conflict,” she said. “It also involves attempts to reshape history and promote a single historical narrative.”
For Bethlehem, the stakes are practical. Water from local springs feeds farms like Jaber’s greenhouse. Losing the pools would cut off recreation and a symbol of continuity.
The broader context is settlement expansion. Netanyahu’s far-right coalition has accelerated building across the West Bank to block Palestinian statehood. Solomon’s Pools is the latest target.
Area B and Area C are already under heavy Israeli control. Area A was considered off-limits until recently. If the pools are seized, other Palestinian cities could follow.
Timing may matter. Israeli elections are due in October. Analysts expect more incursions as ministers seek to rally their base with nationalist gestures.
The pools’ condition is being used as justification. Photos show discarded bottles in one corner. But Palestinians say neglect followed the PA’s funding freeze, not mismanagement.
Israel argues security and heritage. Palestinians argue sovereignty and international law. Both sides cite history to support their case.
The reservoirs no longer supply Jerusalem. Modern pipes replaced the Roman aqueducts long ago. Their value now is cultural, environmental, and political.
For local children, the fight feels personal. Swimming spots are scarce. “Now they are trying to steal it” sums up the mood in Artas and al-Khader.
International reaction has been muted so far. The pools are not on the World Heritage list, though experts say they qualify. UNESCO has not commented.
Legal experts say any annexation would violate Oslo and the Fourth Geneva Convention. Israel disputes that the conventions apply to the West Bank.
Meanwhile, life continues around the water. On a recent afternoon, boys raced to dive while elders watched from the shade. The sound of splashing echoed off ancient stone.
What happens next is unclear. No formal takeover order has been issued, but the threat is now explicit and backed by armed presence.
Read also: US Iran strikes escalate into Seventh night as Strait of Hormuz conflict deepens
Israel Solomon’s Pools seizure threat represents more than a dispute over water. It is about who gets to write history, control land, and decide the future of Area A.
For Palestinians in Bethlehem, the pools are identity and respite. For Smotrich and allies, they are a symbol to reclaim. The coming months will decide which narrative prevails.
About The Author
