Rights activist Deji Adeyanju urges opposition parties to support the EFCC investigation of Abubakar Malami, insisting accountability must rise above politics.
Human rights lawyer and activist, Deji Adeyanju, has criticised opposition political parties for what he described as their inconsistent posture toward Nigeria’s anti-corruption efforts, particularly following recent actions taken by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN.
Adeyanju’s comments come amid growing political reactions to the EFCC investigation involving the former justice minister, with some opposition figures questioning the motives of the anti-graft agency and accusing it of selective enforcement.
The activist, however, warned that such responses undermine the broader fight against corruption and weaken public confidence in accountability institutions.
In a statement issued to journalists on Monday, Adeyanju expressed disappointment at what he termed the “politicisation of anti-corruption processes,” stressing that the EFCC investigation should be judged strictly on legal and ethical grounds rather than partisan loyalty.
According to him, opposition parties have a moral responsibility to support transparency and accountability, regardless of whose interests are affected
He argued that demanding justice only when it suits political convenience sends the wrong signal to Nigerians who expect fairness and consistency from political leaders.
“I am deeply troubled by the reaction of some opposition figures to the ongoing EFCC investigation involving a former Attorney-General of the Federation,” Adeyanju said.
“You cannot credibly campaign for a better Nigeria while appearing to shield individuals facing serious allegations of corruption simply because of political alignment.”
The activist maintained that allegations raised against Malami are serious enough to warrant a thorough probe, insisting that no public official, past or present, should be immune from lawful scrutiny.
He noted that accountability is a cornerstone of democracy and must not be sacrificed on the altar of political rivalry.
Adeyanju further stated that rather than attacking the EFCC, opposition parties should be at the forefront of demanding transparent investigations, fair procedures, and due process.
In his view, such an approach would strengthen democratic institutions and reinforce the rule of law.
“What the opposition should be calling for is a transparent, comprehensive, and professional EFCC investigation, not media campaigns aimed at discrediting the commission,” he said.
“If there is confidence in the innocence of anyone under investigation, the legal process should be allowed to run its full course.”
He also cautioned against what he described as attempts to vilify the EFCC whenever politically exposed individuals are invited or questioned.
Adeyanju argued that undermining the anti-graft agency damages national efforts to tackle corruption, which remains one of Nigeria’s most persistent challenges.
Referencing past high-profile cases, Adeyanju pointed out that the EFCC investigation framework has been applied to individuals across different political parties and administrations.
He insisted that selective outrage weakens the credibility of those who claim to stand for reform.
“The fight against corruption cannot succeed if we defend people based on party colour or political convenience,” he said.
“The EFCC investigation process must apply equally to everyone. That is the only way Nigerians can believe that justice is not for sale.”
Adeyanju also addressed concerns about abuse of power by law enforcement agencies, acknowledging that institutions must always operate within the bounds of the law.
However, he warned that legitimate concerns should be addressed through legal channels rather than blanket condemnation or political grandstanding.
He urged civil society groups, political actors, and the public to focus on strengthening institutions rather than weakening them through unfounded accusations.
According to him, constructive criticism should aim to improve transparency and professionalism, not obstruct investigations.
As the EFCC investigation continues, Adeyanju called on Nigerians to resist the temptation of taking sides prematurely.
He stressed that allegations remain allegations until proven in court, but added that allowing investigations to proceed without interference is essential for justice to prevail.
Ireport247news
About The Author
