The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has publicly addressed the ongoing investigations involving former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir el-Rufai, and former Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami, calling for transparency in legal proceedings and strict adherence to constitutional principles.
In a statement released by its National Publicity Secretary, Bolaji Abdullahi, the party said it has been closely observing developments surrounding the cases.
While affirming that no citizen is above the law, the ADC stressed that investigations and prosecutions must reflect transparency in legal proceedings to maintain public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system.
According to the party, concerns have emerged regarding the manner in which enforcement actions involving El-Rufai and Malami are being handled.
The ADC noted that both men have reportedly been moved between different security and investigative agencies while inquiries are still ongoing.
It argued that such custodial movements, especially in high-profile cases, risk creating perceptions that could undermine transparency in legal proceedings.
The party maintained that in a constitutional democracy, detention should ordinarily follow the filing of formal charges backed by credible evidence.
It warned that any approach suggesting punishment before trial could erode trust in the judicial process.

For the ADC, ensuring transparency in legal proceedings is not merely about the individuals involved but about safeguarding democratic norms.
“If there is evidence against Abubakar Malami, prosecute him openly and in line with due process.
If there is evidence against Nasir el-Rufai, bring it before a competent court and allow the law to take its course,” the statement read.
The party insisted that transparency in legal proceedings must guide every stage of the process, from investigation to arraignment and trial.
The ADC further expressed concern that enforcement measures should not appear to move more swiftly against opposition figures compared to others facing allegations.
Public trust, it argued, depends heavily on equal treatment before the law.
The party referenced another prominent case involving allegations of passport forgery, international conspiracy, and impersonation, where the defendants were granted bail after pleading not guilty, and proceedings continue in court.
By contrasting the two situations, the ADC suggested that prolonged detention or repeated transfers between agencies in the El-Rufai and Malami matters have fueled debate among observers.
It emphasised that consistency is essential to preserving transparency in legal proceedings and avoiding the impression of selective justice.
Reaffirming its respect for the rule of law, the party stated that it supports lawful investigations and prosecutions.
However, it insisted that such actions must be free from political undertones.
According to the ADC, the principle of presumption of innocence remains fundamental, and both El-Rufai and Malami are entitled to that protection until proven guilty by a court of competent jurisdiction.
The party clarified that its support for the two politicians should not be misinterpreted as an attempt to shield them from accountability.
Rather, it said its position is rooted in defending constitutional safeguards available to every Nigerian citizen.
The ADC maintained that democracy thrives only when institutions operate independently and without external pressure.
Observers note that the cases involving El-Rufai, a former governor known for his outspoken political style, and Malami, who served as the nation’s chief law officer, naturally attract heightened public attention.
Their prominence amplifies scrutiny of how the investigations are conducted and how authorities communicate developments to the public.
The ADC called on relevant agencies to provide clear updates regarding the status of the investigations, including whether formal charges are being prepared.
It argued that timely communication would reduce speculation and strengthen confidence in the system.
Ultimately, the party concluded that Nigeria’s democratic credibility depends on justice being applied impartially, regardless of political affiliation or status.
It warned that any perception of uneven enforcement could weaken faith in public institutions.
As the legal processes continue, the ADC reiterated that it would remain engaged, monitoring events and advocating for fairness.
It emphasised that while accountability is essential, the pathway to it must always reflect due process, constitutional order, and transparency in legal proceedings.
Ireport247news


