UPDATE: Reps Rescind Decision to Strip VP, Others of Immunity

The House's decision to rescind its earlier decision has sparked interest, with many waiting to see how the debate will unfold.

0
62

The House of Representatives has made a surprise move by rescinding its decision to pass two controversial bills for second reading.

The bills in question sought to strip the Vice President, Governors, and Deputy Governors of immunity, as well as review penalties for certain capital offenses.

The decision to rescind was made due to the need for further debate on the sensitive issues involved. Deputy Speaker Benjamin Okezie Kalu, who presided over the plenary, stated that the bills will be brought back to the House for debate by members.

One of the bills, sponsored by Solomon Bob (PDP, Rivers), aimed to remove immunity from the Vice President, Governors, and their Deputies to curb corruption, eradicate impunity, and enhance accountability in public office.

The other bill, sponsored by Deputy Speaker Kalu and six others, sought to review penalties for certain capital offenses in alignment with international best practices.

The House’s decision to rescind its earlier decision has sparked interest, with many waiting to see how the debate will unfold.

The bills’ sponsors and supporters will likely face opposition from those who believe the immunity clause is essential for the smooth functioning of government.

As the debate continues, Nigerians will be watching closely to see how their representatives vote on these critical issues. The outcome will have significant implications for the country’s governance, accountability, and rule of law.

The House of Representatives’ surprise move to rescind its decision on the two controversial bills has opened up a new chapter in the debate on immunity and capital offenses. As the bills are brought back to the House for debate, members will have to carefully weigh the pros and cons of stripping the Vice President, Governors, and Deputy Governors of immunity.

On one hand, removing immunity could help curb corruption and enhance accountability in public office. On the other hand, some argue that the immunity clause is essential for the smooth functioning of government.

As Nigerians watch the debate unfold, they will be waiting to see how their representatives vote on these critical issues. The outcome will have significant implications for the country’s governance, accountability, and rule of law. It’s worth noting that this isn’t the first time the House of Representatives has rescinded a decision on a controversial bill.

In 2022, the House rescinded its decision on three gender bills that aimed to promote women’s rights and inclusion. The move was seen as a positive step towards addressing gender inequality in Nigeria.

Leave a Reply