The Federal Government has defended President Bola Tinubu’s decision to declare a state of emergency in Rivers State, citing the need to prevent a complete breakdown of order in the state. The government’s defense comes amidst controversy surrounding the emergency rule, with some critics arguing that it is an attack on democracy.
The FG defended Tinubu’s amidst crisis in Rivers State, which stems from a prolonged power struggle between Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his predecessor, Nyesom Wike, now the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory. The situation had paralyzed governance in the oil-rich state, prompting Tinubu to take the extraordinary measure.
Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, FG defended Tinubu’s decision, stating that it was necessary to prevent a complete breakdown of order in the state. Fagbemi argued that the emergency rule was aimed at restoring stability and security in the state, which had been threatened by the prolonged power struggle.
Fagbemi also announced that funds allocated to Rivers State would be channeled to the state’s sole administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ette Ibas. This move is seen as an attempt to ensure continuity of governance in the state amid the political instability.
The declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State has elicited mixed reactions from stakeholders. While some have welcomed the move as a necessary step to restore stability and security, others have criticized it as an attack on democracy and the rule of law.
The emergency rule in Rivers State has significant implications for the state’s governance and economy. The suspension of the governor, deputy governor, and state lawmakers has raised concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the undermining of democratic institutions.
In conclusion, the Federal Government’s defense of emergency rule in Rivers State highlights the complexity of the crisis in the state. While the government argues that the emergency rule is necessary to restore stability and security, critics argue that it is an attack on democracy. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the emergency rule will impact the state’s governance and economy.