We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
We have a curated list of the most noteworthy news from all across the globe. With any subscription plan, you get access to exclusive articles that let you stay ahead of the curve.
Chelsea moved top of the Premier League with a 2-0 win over Fulham, but the game was overshadowed by two major VAR interventions that left Marco Silva furious.
Josh King thought he had given Fulham the lead after 21 minutes when he cut inside and buried a low strike past Robert Sanchez, only for referee Rob Jones to overturn the goal following a pitchside review.
Referee Robert Jones checks the VAR monitor at Stamford Bridge (AP Photo/Ian Walton)
The decision sparked disbelief from Silva, who described it as “unbelievable” in his post-match press conference.
“It is not a foul, it should stand,” he said. “The VAR should just stay out of it—it was not a clear and obvious error. Nobody thinks that is a foul.”
Former referee Mike Dean agreed, calling it a “poor, poor call” on Soccer Saturday, Pundits including Jamie Carragher also labelled the intervention “shocking.”
Chelsea took advantage just before half-time when Joao Pedro’s header struck the arm of Ryan Sessegnon. After another lengthy review, Jones awarded a penalty—despite VAR also checking a potential foul on Alex Iwobi and a handball by Pedro earlier in the move.
Silva again voiced his frustration at the inconsistency of the officiating.
“The same VAR that found something unbelievable in the first half didn’t see the stamp on Iwobi or the push on Andersen,” he said.
Chelsea boss Enzo Maresca insisted both decisions were correct:
“It was quite clear. Their player kicked ours for the first one, and the penalty is handball. I am very happy with the result, if not the first half.”
Despite Fulham’s spirited first-half performance, the disallowed goal proved a turning point, Deflated after the restart, Silva’s men slipped to their first league defeat of the season.
Analysis
Silva cut a frustrated figure throughout, pacing the touchline and remonstrating with officials as decision after decision went against his side.
Fulham had looked the better team early on, only to see their momentum killed by VAR.
Fulham boss Marco Silva on the touchline at Stamford Bridge
The Fulham manager chose to focus on positives post-match, stressing that his side had impressed in performances against Brighton, Manchester United and now Chelsea, even if results have yet to reflect their efforts.
With reinforcements expected before Deadline Day, Silva remains confident luck will soon turn. But for now, VAR—and not their football—was the talking point from Stamford Bridge.
I’ve been following your blog for quite some time now, and I’m continually impressed by the quality of your content. Your ability to blend information with entertainment is truly commendable.
helloI really like your writing so a lot share we keep up a correspondence extra approximately your post on AOL I need an expert in this house to unravel my problem May be that is you Taking a look ahead to see you
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
I’ve been following your blog for quite some time now, and I’m continually impressed by the quality of your content. Your ability to blend information with entertainment is truly commendable.
helloI really like your writing so a lot share we keep up a correspondence extra approximately your post on AOL I need an expert in this house to unravel my problem May be that is you Taking a look ahead to see you