The Independent Investigative Panel examining alleged misconduct in the Nigerian Correctional Service (NCoS) has concluded a detailed review of how the Service implements the NCoS Act 2019, particularly regarding inmate rehabilitation, reintegration, and management of proceeds from correctional enterprises.

Dr. Uju Agomoh, Secretary of the Panel, outlined the key points from the third day of the third public hearing in Abuja. She explained that the discussion centered on Sections 10 and 14 of the Act, which outline frameworks for behavioural correction, vocational engagement, and the use of enterprise revenues for inmates’ benefit.
On the topic of behavioural programs under Section 10, the Panel looked closely at subsections D through H. These provisions are designed to identify the causes of antisocial conduct, evaluate inmates’ risks and needs, and guide the implementation of behaviour modification activities.
The Panel asked the NCoS to provide comprehensive information for each state, including the total number of facilities, the operational status of workshops, and other activities supporting these mandates. Where measures have not been implemented, the Service was asked to indicate what steps are required for compliance, and where they exist, to specify the locations.
Section 14, which governs enterprise management and profit allocation, also received significant attention. Section 14(4)(a) requires that one-third of profits from vocational and farm-based enterprises be allocated to inmates.
The Panel requested a state-by-state and centre-by-centre report showing the number of inmates benefiting, and where implementation is lacking, reasons for the gap along with corrective steps.
Agomoh emphasized the importance of the revolving fund provision under Section 14(4)(b), which is meant to ensure sustainability of correctional enterprises. “A proper fund will prevent workshops from shutting down due to diversion of operating resources,” she said.
The Panel sought detailed figures on retained enterprise proceeds for each correctional facility, along with timelines, challenges, and potential support needed to achieve compliance.
The Panel also discussed promoting innovation and incentives within the NCoS. Centres demonstrating exemplary practices—such as high inmate participation in workshops and diverse enterprise activities—would be recognized. To support this, the Panel requested a full list of workshops and farm centres, along with participation numbers and patterns that could inform future improvements.
Aftercare services were another focus, particularly whether the non-custodial directorate established under the 2019 Act could better manage post-release and community-based programs.
The Panel confirmed receiving a preliminary report of inmates trained from January to July 2025 and the equipment distributed, but requested a detailed breakdown by correctional centre, including the type of skill or trade taught and whether skill assessments were conducted.
The session concluded with a broader review of rehabilitation, reintegration, and post-release support measures. The Panel stressed that all legal provisions must translate into real-world outcomes that benefit inmates and society at large.