Donald Trump’s recent trip to Scotland has sparked intense debate about his leadership style, with many questioning whether he is a true leader or just a bully. Trump‘s interactions with world leaders, including British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, have raised concerns about his ability to navigate complex global issues.
Trump’s presidency has been marked by a series of “wins” that have been largely driven by his own interests, rather than the interests of the American people. His coercive power over allies and smaller states has been particularly concerning, with many wondering whether this approach will ultimately benefit or harm the United States in the long run. Trump’s handling of three critical issues – Gaza, Ukraine, and trade – will be crucial in determining his true leadership abilities.
Trump’s response to the growing famine in Gaza has been notable, with the president promising to set up food distribution centers to alleviate the crisis. However, critics argue that Trump’s commitment may be more driven by politics than a genuine desire to help those in need. Trump’s previous suggestion that Gazans should leave to allow for the creation of a “Middle East Riviera” beach resort has raised questions about his true motives. As Trump said, “We have to get the kids fed,” but the details of his plan remain unclear.
Trump’s handling of the Ukraine conflict will be another key test of his leadership. The president has vented frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s refusal to accept his peace deal suggestions, but it remains to be seen whether Trump will follow through on his threats. A robust move against Putin could hurt Russia, but it would also require the US to take on powers like India and China, risking global economic blowback. Trump’s comments about Putin, saying “We have such nice conversations, such respectful and nice conversations. And then people die the following night,” highlight the complexities of their relationship.
Trump’s trade deal with the European Union has been touted as a major win for the president, but critics argue that it may not be as significant as it seems. The deal includes a 15% tariff on European exports, which will likely hurt both the US and EU economies. As Fredrik Persson, president of BusinessEurope, noted, “It’s a number that will hurt both the US and EU economies.” The deal may be more of a pragmatic move to avoid a trade war, rather than a genuine victory for Trump’s “America First” policies.
Trump’s leadership style has been characterized as autocratic and transactional, with the president prioritizing his own interests over the needs of others. This approach has led to concerns about the erosion of US soft power and the potential for long-term damage to American relationships with its allies. As Kori Schake, a former Bush administration foreign policy official, wrote, the Trump team is hastening a future in which countries “opt out of the existing US-led international order or construct a new one that would be antagonistic to American interests.” Ultimately, Trump’s leadership style will be defined by his ability to navigate complex global issues and prioritize the interests of the American people.