Council Hails Jonathan’s Selfless Example in Political Maturity

Uwah described Jonathan's decision as one of the most defining moments of democratic maturity in Africa. He emphasized that Jonathan's concession stands as a shining example of leadership and a commitment to peace, democracy, and national stability.

0
87

Ten years ago, on March 31, 2015, former Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan made history. He conceded defeat to Muhammadu Buhari in a fiercely contested presidential election. This unprecedented act stunned Nigerians and captured the attention of the world. The Executive Secretary of the International Supreme Council for Peace Africa, Ambassador Simeon Uwah, has highlighted the remarkable sacrifice. Jonathan prioritized peace and democracy over personal ambition.

Uwah described Goodluck Jonathan’s decision as one of the most defining moments of democratic maturity in Africa. He emphasized that Jonathan’s concession is a shining example of leadership. It reflects a commitment to peace, democracy, and national stability. “In an era where political leaders across Africa often resort to violence, electoral disputes, or unconstitutional maneuvers to hold onto power, Jonathan’s concession stands as a beacon of hope for democratic governance,” Uwah said.

Uwah further noted that Jonathan’s now-famous phone call to Buhari offered more than just a gracious acknowledgment. It provided a deliberate act of commitment to peace and democracy. “His phone call to Buhari was not merely a gesture of sportsmanship—it was a purposeful step towards ensuring peace. This single act helped avert post-election violence, saved countless lives, and strengthened Nigeria’s democratic standing on the global stage,” Uwah added.


Uwah emphasized that Jonathan’s decision should serve as a model for African leaders, particularly as the continent continues to face political crises. “As Africa grapples with military coups, disputed elections, democratic backsliding, and the entrenchment of authoritarian regimes, Jonathan’s approach remains a crucial blueprint for democratic governance and reforms,” Uwah said.



Uwah suggested that Jonathan’s peaceful concession should be taught as a case study in governance. It should be included in leadership training for African leaders. He urged the African Union and the Economic Community of West African States to set standards for peaceful handovers. They should establish leadership transitions encouraging democratic practices to protect the continent’s democracy from slipping away. “Political transitions should be collaborative, not adversarial,” Uwah urged. “Future leaders must embrace bipartisanship and national reconciliation as core principles of governance.”

Jonathan’s historic concession in 2015 serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of leadership, peace, and democracy in Africa. As the continent continues to face numerous challenges, Jonathan’s example offers a beacon of hope for a brighter future. As Uwah aptly put it, “Jonathan’s ambition was not worth the blood of any Nigerian.” This mindset should be adopted by African leaders—not just in rhetoric but in practice—moving forward.

Leave a Reply