In a recent interview, sources within the Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) have revealed that the Forum’s decision to take a neutral stance on President Bola Tinubu’s declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State has sparked a heated debate among its members.
Rivers State has been embroiled in a governance deadlock for nearly two years, with former Governor Nyesom Wike and his successor, Sim Fubara, vying for power. The state’s political instability has crippled its governance and led to widespread violence, prompting President Tinubu to declare a state of emergency.
The NGF’s decision to take a neutral stance on the matter has been met with mixed reactions. While some governors have praised the Forum’s commitment to promoting unified policies and collaborative efforts for sustainable socioeconomic growth, others have criticized the move as a lack of leadership.
Sources within the NGF have revealed that the Forum’s chairman, Governor Kayode Fayemi, played a crucial role in convincing members to adopt a neutral stance.
“Governor Fayemi’s leadership was instrumental in shaping the Forum’s response to the Rivers State crisis,” a source said. “He emphasized the need for the NGF to maintain its neutrality and avoid taking sides.”
A renowned expert on Nigerian politics, has warned that the NGF’s neutrality may have far-reaching consequences for the country’s democracy.
“The NGF’s decision to take a neutral stance on the Rivers State emergency rule is a missed opportunity for leadership,” He said in an exclusive interview. “By failing to take a clear position on the matter, the Forum is essentially abdicating its responsibility to promote good governance and democracy.”
In the recent interview, the NGF’s Director General, Abdulateef Shittu, emphasized the Forum’s commitment to promoting unified policies and collaborative efforts for sustainable socioeconomic growth.
“We understand the gravity of the situation in Rivers State, and we are committed to finding a solution that works for all parties involved,” Shittu said. “However, we cannot take a position that may be perceived as partisan or divisive. Our role is to promote unity and cooperation among governors, and we will continue to work towards that goal.”
The declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State has raised questions about the future of the state’s governance. While some have praised President Tinubu’s decision as a necessary step to restore order and stability, others have criticized the move as an attack on democracy.
The NGF’s decision to take a neutral stance on the Rivers State emergency rule has sparked a heated debate among its members and experts. As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear: the need for leadership and cooperation has never been more pressing.