Former Kaduna State Governor, Nasir El-Rufai, has strongly condemned the imposition of an emergency rule in Rivers State, describing it as an “aggression against democracy”. El-Rufai’s comments come amidst growing concerns over the erosion of democratic principles in Nigeria.
The crisis in Rivers State began with a contentious election, which led to widespread violence and allegations of electoral malpractices. The situation escalated, prompting the Federal Government to impose an emergency rule in the state.
El-Rufai, who is known for his outspoken views, did not mince words in his criticism of the emergency rule. He argued that the imposition of an emergency rule was an affront to democratic principles and a clear indication of the Federal Government’s disregard for the rule of law.
The imposition of an emergency rule in Rivers State has significant implications for democracy in Nigeria. It sets a dangerous precedent, where the Federal Government can unilaterally impose its will on a state, without recourse to democratic institutions.
Other stakeholders, including civil society organizations and opposition parties, have also condemned the imposition of an emergency rule in Rivers State. They argue that the move is a clear attempt to subvert the democratic process and consolidate power in the hands of the ruling party.
The imposition of an emergency rule in Rivers State also raises significant constitutional questions. The Nigerian Constitution provides for a clear separation of powers between the Federal Government and the states. The imposition of an emergency rule blurs this distinction, creating a situation where the Federal Government can unilaterally impose its will on a state.