Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has initiated contempt proceedings against the Senate, putting President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and others at risk of imprisonment for allegedly disobeying a court order.
The move is the latest development in the ongoing dispute between Senator Natasha and the Senate.
The controversy began when Senator Natasha was suspended by the Senate, sparking widespread outrage and condemnation. The suspension was widely seen as unfair and politically motivated, leading to calls for Senator Natasha’s reinstatement.
In response to the suspension, Senator Natasha approached the Federal High Court in Abuja, seeking relief and justice. The court, presided over by Justice O.A. Egwuatu, issued an order on March 4, 2025, granting Senator Natasha permission for substituted service, an interim injunction restraining the Senate Ethics Committee from proceeding with an investigation, and directing the defendants to show cause why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted.
Despite being served with the enrolled order on March 5, 2025, Akpabio, Senator Neda Imasuem, and the Clerk of the National Assembly deliberately disregarded its binding directive, proceeding with acts in defiance of the court’s authority. The court’s decision to initiate contempt proceedings against the defendants puts them at risk of imprisonment for disobeying the court order.
The court’s ruling has significant implications for Akpabio, Senator Imasuem, and the Clerk of the National Assembly. If found guilty of contempt, they may face imprisonment, fines, or other penalties. The ruling also serves as a warning to others who may be tempted to disobey court orders, highlighting the importance of respecting the rule of law.
Defamation laws in Nigeria provide protection against false and damaging statements. In this case, the court’s decision to initiate contempt proceedings against the defendants may also have implications for defamation claims. Senator Natasha may be able to seek damages for any harm caused to her reputation by the defendants’ actions.
The case raises important questions about freedom of speech and the limits of expression. While individuals have the right to express themselves freely, they must also respect the rights of others and avoid making false and damaging statements. The court’s decision may have implications for freedom of speech, highlighting the need for individuals to be mindful of the impact of their words.
The court’s ruling in the contempt proceedings against Akpabio, Senator Imasuem, and the Clerk of the National Assembly is a significant development in the ongoing dispute between Senator Natasha and the Senate. The case highlights the importance of respecting the rule of law and the need for individuals to be mindful of the impact of their actions.