A human rights lawyer, Sir Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has criticized Anambra State Governor Chukwuma Soludo’s decision to ban public preaching and impose a ₦500,000 fine on violators. This move has raised concerns about religious freedom in the state.
Soludo announced the ban in a viral video, stopping a preacher at a market and warning him to stop causing noise pollution. The governor directed the preacher to take his preaching to a church or rent an open ground, threatening a ₦500,000 fine for non-compliance. The ban has sparked controversy, with many questioning its legality and potential impact on religious freedom.
Ejiofor argued that the ban is an overreach that raises serious concerns about religious freedom. He cited Section 38 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of worship [2]. Ejiofor suggested that instead of an outright ban, the governor should have explored ways to regulate and moderate public preaching to avoid noise pollution. He emphasized that the ban is a dangerous precedent that must be revisited.
The ban on public preaching has significant implications for religious freedom in Anambra State. Many residents have expressed concerns that the ban will stifle their ability to practice their faith freely. The ban also raises questions about the role of government in regulating religious activities. Ejiofor emphasized that in a democratic society, policies must align with justice, fairness, and respect for rights.
Soludo has stated that the ban is necessary to curb noise pollution and maintain public order. Neighboring states like Abia and Enugu have been cited as examples of effective governance without stifling religious liberties
The ban has sparked debate about the constitutionality of the ban. Many have argued that the ban violates Section 38 (1) of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right to freedom of worship.
The ban on public preaching in Anambra State has sparked controversy and raised concerns about religious freedom. Ejiofor’s criticism of the ban highlights the need for the government to respect the rights of citizens to practice their faith freely. As the situation unfolds, it is essential to consider the implications of the ban and the potential impact on religious freedom in the state.